In this thought-provoking article in Principal Leadership, Nancy Frey and Douglas Fisher (San Diego
State University) and Heather Anderson (Health Science High School) draw a
distinction between essential questions that are course-specific (for example, How do fractions, decimals, and percentages
allow us to describe the world?) and schoolwide essential questions. Frey,
Fisher, and Anderson describe how Anderson’s high school has used a set of
schoolwide essential questions each year to provoke high-level discourse and
improve student achievement. In developing its questions, the school used the
definition developed by Grant
Wiggins and Jay McTighe
(2013):
-
Essential
questions are worthy of inquiry, calling for higher-order thinking – analysis,
inference, evaluation, and prediction.
-
They are
thought-provoking and intellectually engaging, sparking discussion and debate,
giving students the tools and a forum to wrestle with important ideas.
-
They are
open-ended – that is, there isn’t a single, final, correct answer.
-
They
require support and justification, not just the answer.
-
They
produce a humbling acceptance that some matters are never truly settled, but at
the same time a desire to think about such questions.
-
They
point toward important, transferable ideas within and across disciplines.
-
They
raise additional questions, spark further inquiry, and need to be revisited
over time.
Each year the school
collects possible questions, screens them using the Wiggins/McTighe criteria
(plus one more – questions involve two or more academic disciplines), asks
students to vote on them, and decides on the best sequence (one question for
each academic quarter). Here are some of the school’s essential questions from
recent years:
-
What
sustains us?
-
If we
can, should we?
-
Does age
matter?
-
How do
people approach their health?
-
What is
race, and does it matter?
-
Can you
buy your way to happiness?
-
Who am
I? Why do I matter?
-
What is
beauty and/or what is beautiful?
-
Does
gender matter?
-
Who are
your heroes and role models?
-
What’s
worth fighting or even dying for?
-
What
will you, or won’t you, do for love?
-
What is
normal, anyway?
-
How does
your world influence you?
-
Is there
a limit to tolerance?
-
What
makes you “you”?
-
Which is
worse, failing or never trying?
-
You
exist, but do you live?
-
If you
could have a superpower, what would it be and why?
-
Are
humans naturally good or evil?
-
Is
freedom ever free?
-
Do looks
matter?
Each year’s questions
are displayed in public areas of the school and sent home to parents, and
visitors are given the opportunity to comment in a response log. Teachers start
the year by thinking about how to integrate the questions into their own course
content and, if possible, make cross-disciplinary links. For example, a 2010-11
question about beauty led English teachers to have students read The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, The Birthmark by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Body Rituals Among the Nacirema by
Horace Miner, “Ain’t I a Woman” by Sojourner Truth, and “Ode to a Grecian Urn”
by John Keats. A tenth-grade World History teacher addressed the issue through
a study of philosophers of the Enlightenment, and a geometry teacher looked at
the concept of the golden mean in architecture and design.
When the school first started using schoolwide questions,
students were asked to write about them in a single discipline. “Over time, we
began to understand that complex interdisciplinary thinking requires that
students participate in discussion and debate before writing,” say Frey,
Fisher, and Anderson. “Teachers now devote a portion of one class period each
week to a Socratic circle on the question of the quarter.” The location of
these discussions rotates among the four core academic classes so students
think about the questions from every possible angle. Student responses can come
in a variety of formats – formal research papers, Facebook postings, 3-D
sculptures, animations, and more.
“Using Schoolwide
Essential Questions to Drive Learning” by Nancy Frey, Douglas Fisher, and
Heather Anderson in Principal Leadership,
February 2014 (Vol. 14, #6, p. 52-55), www.nassp.org;
the authors can be reached at nfrey@mail.sdsu.edu,
dfisher@mail.sdsu.edu, and hlanderson@hshmc.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment